Skip to content
PEER REVIEW – RESEARCH & SCIENCE POLICY
PEER REVIEW – SCIENTIFIC TRAINING
Reviewed publication: Insights from a survey-based analysis of the academic job market . Jason D. Fernandes , Sarvenaz Sarabipour , Christopher T. Smith , Natalie M. Niemi , Nafisa M. Jadavji , Ariangela J. Kozik , Alex S. Holehouse , Vikas Pejaver , Orsolya Symmons , Alexandre W. Bisson Filho , Amanda Haage. eLife 2020;9:e54097 doi: 10.7554/eLife.54097.
Bankston A. Referee Report For: Use and effectiveness of the Individual Development Plan among postdoctoral researchers: findings from a cross-sectional study [version 1; referees: 3 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2018, 7 :1132 (doi: 10.5256/f1000research.17029.r37952). [Direct report URL ].
Bankston A. Referee Report For: Evaluating disparities in the U.S. technology transfer ecosystem to improve bench to business translation [version 1; referees: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2018, 7 :329 (doi: 10.5256/f1000research.15458.r32556). [Direct report URL ].
PUBLICATION REVIEWS (AD HOC)
Nature Communications (2016)
PLoS One (2016)
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, section Molecular Medicine (2016)
The Journal of Physiology (2016)
BioTechniques (2016)
Scientific Reports – Nature Publishing Group (2014)
EDITED GRANTS
PI’s R01 grants, F31 pre-doctoral fellowship (2016)
Like this: Like Loading...