PEER REVIEW – SCIENCE POLICY

• NSF Reviewer 2021
• Weather, Climate, and Society (WCAS) (November 2020)
• Health Policy and Technology (HPT) (October 2020)

PEER REVIEW – SCIENTIFIC TRAINING

• Reviewed publication: Insights from a survey-based analysis of the academic job market. Jason D. Fernandes, Sarvenaz Sarabipour, Christopher T. Smith, Natalie M. Niemi, Nafisa M. Jadavji, Ariangela J. Kozik, Alex S. Holehouse, Vikas Pejaver, Orsolya Symmons, Alexandre W. Bisson Filho, Amanda Haage. eLife 2020;9:e54097 doi: 10.7554/eLife.54097. 
• Bankston A. Referee Report For: Use and effectiveness of the Individual Development Plan among postdoctoral researchers: findings from a cross-sectional study [version 1; referees: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1132 (doi: 10.5256/f1000research.17029.r37952). [Direct report URL].
• Bankston A. Referee Report For: Evaluating disparities in the U.S. technology transfer ecosystem to improve bench to business translation [version 1; referees: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2018, 7:329 (doi: 10.5256/f1000research.15458.r32556). [Direct report URL].

PUBLICATION REVIEWS (AD HOC)

• Nature Communications (2016)
• PLoS One (2016)
• Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, section Molecular Medicine (2016)
  
• The Journal of Physiology (2016)
• BioTechniques (2016)
• Scientific Reports – Nature Publishing Group (2014)

EDITED GRANTS

• PI’s R01 grants, F31 pre-doctoral fellowship (2016)